Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Ryan Peniston vs James Ward Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Peniston vs Ward analysis and find out who is favored!
Ryan Peniston vs James Ward Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Peniston 0 - 0 Ward
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Peniston has won 50.76% of points on their second serve, while Ward has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Peniston, in recent form, has won 53.09% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ward has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.09% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Peniston has saved 48.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ward has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Peniston has won 51.06% of matches played (W/L 24/ 23), with Ward winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Peniston has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 151/ 81), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 54/ 46). Ward has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 219/ 173), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 46/ 60).
- Player level: In the last year, Peniston has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.41% of matches (W/L 22/ 17), where as Ward has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Peniston has played against opponents with an average rank of 248.32 while Ward has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Peniston has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ward has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Peniston has converted 37.66% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ward has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
228
Rank
123
High
28
Age
L
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
89
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
60% (288-189)
Career Total W/L
52% (402-374)
31% (4-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$221,850
Career Prize Money
$460,450
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Ryan Peniston vs James Ward For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Peniston VS Ward
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Ryan Peniston | James Ward |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (12/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (129/143) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 34 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 30 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:34 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (468/799) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (321/468) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (168/331) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (29/77) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (338/906) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (4/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Ryan Peniston Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Jack Pinnington Jones
Player
Ryan Peniston
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
63 of
90)
15
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
3
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
34 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Ryan Peniston
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
36 of
55)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Luke Saville
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
45%
(
22 of
49)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Ryan Peniston
62%
(
55 of
89)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
43 of
88)
104
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Buldorini
Player
Ryan Peniston
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve %
67%
(
12 of
18)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
50%
(
10 of
20)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
9 of
12)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
51%
(
18 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
22
Total Points Won
31
|
2-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Ryan Peniston
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
12
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Ryan Peniston
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
35 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jason Jung
Player
Ryan Peniston
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
18 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Peniston
Player
Gijs Brouwer
42%
(
19 of
45)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
James Ward Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Peter Gojowczyk
Player
James Ward
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Illya Marchenko
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
17
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
14 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
James Ward
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
2
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
4 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-6(1) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vasek Pospisil
Player
James Ward
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Illya Marchenko
Player
James Ward
45%
(
33 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Ward
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
106)
9
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
47 of
61)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
James Ward
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
99)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
76%
(
22 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
10 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
99)
86
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
James Ward
51%
(
33 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 2-6 6-3 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(5) 10-7 | H2H | |||
view more
Peniston Vs Ward Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Peniston are available here and Ward photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
